Dr. John Cramer's "The Lentz Soliton FTL Drive" Article

Hello all, 

I wanted to write a short post to acknowledge the first online article I found to talk about my hyper-fast soliton work. Back in November, long before the press release while my manuscript was still under peer review, Dr. John Cramer wrote a perspective on my paper in his long-standing science column "The Alternate View" in Analog: Science Fiction and Fact Magazine. John also happens to be professor emeritus at my own Ph.D. institution, the University of Washington. You can find the article in the archives of the Analog website (https://www.analogsf.com). John also keeps a repository of his past articles at UW where the "The Lentz Soliton FTL Drive" can be found (https://www.npl.washington.edu/av/altvw209.html). While there, you can also check out his other columns (https://www.npl.washington.edu/av/av_index.html).

Have a good Sunday.

Erik

Comments

  1. UnknownMarch 21, 2021 at 8:22 AM

    Erik,

    Firstlt, target to send out messages at FTL speeds. That should reduce energy requirements substantially (NASA, ESA spacecraft). We are a race that has not send humans beyond the moon so far, so there is no hurry in getting to the stars.

    Secondly, plan to send out very small devices such as cameras in various EM spectrum. Those should also have low(ish) energy requirements.

    Thirdly, forget about Proxima and Alpha Centauri for the first few flights. Send cameras perpendicular to the our galactic plane, so that we can get a grand view of our home. Stars will follow, of course.

    Finally, why so pessimistic ? In a millennium ? Really ? With smart people such as you around, we should be sending messages (at the very least) in a few years. I will be 56 in less than a month, so please get this done quickly.

    Harsh

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Please note that comments undergo a moderation process and may not appear immediately. Thanks!

Popular posts from this blog

The Horizon Problem for Faster than Light Travel

Image
Hello all, As I have mentioned in previous posts, a major hurdle for autonomous FLT travel is the horizon problem. But what is a horizon? Is it some single well-defined concept or a catch-all term for many phenomena? In this post, I present some thoughts on horizons in general relativity theory and their implications for FTL travel using warp drives. A horizon is a limit to the region that can be observed or communicated with in a space. On Earth, horizons can be used to refer to edge of what can be seen when looking out over a vast body of water like an ocean. The limit to what can be seen in this case is caused by the curvature of the Earth's surface and is a cute problem to calculate how distant the horizon appears given the height of an observer above the surface of a spherical Earth (ignoring effects of the Earth's atmosphere) that is straightforward to solve as it is embedded in a Euclidean geometry.  An observer looking out to the Earth's horizon from a height h abov
Read more

Warp Drive Soliton Inertia

Hello All, In this post I log some thoughts on another proposed challenge to superluminal warp drives: acceleration of the soliton past the speed of light. In their paper published earlier this year, Bobrick and Martire ( Introducing Physical Warp Drives ) state on page 17 of their pre-print that one cannot accelerate a subluminal warp drive to superluminal speeds for similar reasons as why one cannot accelerate masses moving through space-time to superluminal speeds: Warp drives can move superluminally only in the same sense as any ordinary inertial mass, test mass, or any other object. Namely, there is no known way of accelerating regular material beyond the speed of light. However, one may postulate a test particle which moves faster than light in relativity, in which case it may continue moving inertially. In the same way, a s warp drives are shells of material, there is no known way of accelerating a warp drive beyond the speed of light. However, one may also postulate the warp
Read more

Response to new paper: "Generic warp drives violate the null energy condition"

 Hello all, I was pointed to a paper that appeared on the arXiv yesterday ( https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.03079v1 ). I am glad to see people taking a close look into my paper ( https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/abe692 , and the latest arXiv version https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.07125v2 ) and the other recent papers on the topic of warp drives ( https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/abdf6e ,  https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.06488 ). I have also been contacted in the last months by several other researchers working to reproduce and expand upon my results. I wanted to make a running post on this paper and a series of posts on other appraisals of my work in this field and the resulting discussions. After reading through their entire paper, I noticed that this new manuscript seems to have overlooked my complete discussion of the weak energy condition (WEC) contained in my published paper, instead referring to an early arXiv manuscript that tracked quantities of energy, momentum, etc. in only an Eulerian f
Read more