Erik Lentz's first announcements

 Hello all, 

This first post is made on the date of this blog's creation. More posts are soon to follow, including

Erik Lentz YouTube talk time


For now, check me out on LinkedIn.

Back to my busy week!

Erik 

Comments

  1. AnonymousMarch 4, 2021 at 4:16 PM

    Thanks for starting a blog!

    ReplyDelete
  2. MarcusMarch 10, 2021 at 2:10 AM

    Curious about your response to https://arxiv.org/pdf/2102.06824.pdf

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ErikMarch 11, 2021 at 5:48 PM

      I plan to make a post about this other paper soon. Keep and eye out. Thanks!

      Delete
  3. UnknownMarch 10, 2021 at 4:39 AM

    Hey Erik,
    I have a question that I was hoping you could help answer.
    During my personal thoughts and speculation on FTL travel and long distance space travel the thought crossed my mind, how do we compensate for space FOD and other large objects during long distance space travel?
    Assuming we are traveling in a vessel via point to point line of sight. Even if we have a destination, there is no way of knowing what could be on the other side of a FTL "slip stream" or what could be in between. We could be flying into another planet or asteroid or even a rock the size of a penny tearing into the fuselage that could be catastrophic.
    Maybe I'm miss understanding you're theory and it would not be an issue "if it would be technically bending space fabric in a point in time" but what physical consequences could be applied to any objects or planets between our start point and our destination point?
    Again, I'm not questioning your theory or objecting at all. Im just stumped on this. Just thinking outside the box!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ErikMarch 11, 2021 at 6:21 PM

      This is a very interesting question that probably requires its own post to address properly. I will say that there has been some work through the years on what would happen to exterior objects that encounter an Alcubierre warp bubble. One particular study that comes to mind (https://arxiv.org/abs/1202.5708v1) shows that objects become "time locked" in the shell of a constant velocity bubble and can become stuck in the leading edge of that bubble if it is moving faster than light.

      Delete
  4. Andrew PalfreymanMarch 14, 2021 at 7:29 PM

    You mention that originally linear and elliptical solutions had been tried (which led to a requirement for negative energy sources) and that your approach critically differs in using hyperbolic solutions. My question is whether you know that parabolic solutions might be fruitful?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ErikMarch 15, 2021 at 5:02 PM

      I spent time thinking about both hyperbolic and parabolic relations among the shift vector components. I chose the hyperbolic relations -- specifically a linear wave equation -- as the geometric properties were simpler to interpret and derive. I do think parabolic relations remain a promising avenue.

      Delete
  5. UnknownApril 22, 2021 at 1:53 AM

    I really like that you have this blog for people to follow your research and news about everything related to it! Thanks very much for that!

    One question I have is, when looking at previous warp drive research, it seems people (like Alcubierre) usually wrote one single paper, and then left their research at that state they described in that paper, moved on to different research, and then some other people many years later found some improvements (usually in regards to lowering the required energy).

    Based on what I've understood you saying in your recent talk on Youtube, it sounds like you hope to write some more papers potentially exploring energy reduction of your, may I call it, "Lentz Drive", and that you'd also like to explore solutions to the problem of accelerating/decelerating it, right?

    That's really great of course that you do not seem to view your research as "done" yet! I just wonder, and I find that an interesting enough question that I want to ask it here, how comes your approach to this differs from how people traditionally treated their warp drive research? Am I right in saying your approach seems to differ quite significantly, in a good way?

    ReplyDelete
  6. UnknownJanuary 26, 2022 at 12:37 AM

    hello ....i was reading your article on positive energy warp bubbles metrics , can you help me wit some materials on the mathematical derivation of the hyperbolic forms ?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Please note that comments undergo a moderation process and may not appear immediately. Thanks!

Popular posts from this blog

The Horizon Problem for Faster than Light Travel

Image
Hello all, As I have mentioned in previous posts, a major hurdle for autonomous FLT travel is the horizon problem. But what is a horizon? Is it some single well-defined concept or a catch-all term for many phenomena? In this post, I present some thoughts on horizons in general relativity theory and their implications for FTL travel using warp drives. A horizon is a limit to the region that can be observed or communicated with in a space. On Earth, horizons can be used to refer to edge of what can be seen when looking out over a vast body of water like an ocean. The limit to what can be seen in this case is caused by the curvature of the Earth's surface and is a cute problem to calculate how distant the horizon appears given the height of an observer above the surface of a spherical Earth (ignoring effects of the Earth's atmosphere) that is straightforward to solve as it is embedded in a Euclidean geometry.  An observer looking out to the Earth's horizon from a height h abov...
Read more

Warp Drive Soliton Inertia

Hello All, In this post I log some thoughts on another proposed challenge to superluminal warp drives: acceleration of the soliton past the speed of light. In their paper published earlier this year, Bobrick and Martire ( Introducing Physical Warp Drives ) state on page 17 of their pre-print that one cannot accelerate a subluminal warp drive to superluminal speeds for similar reasons as why one cannot accelerate masses moving through space-time to superluminal speeds: Warp drives can move superluminally only in the same sense as any ordinary inertial mass, test mass, or any other object. Namely, there is no known way of accelerating regular material beyond the speed of light. However, one may postulate a test particle which moves faster than light in relativity, in which case it may continue moving inertially. In the same way, a s warp drives are shells of material, there is no known way of accelerating a warp drive beyond the speed of light. However, one may also postulate the warp ...
Read more

Response to new paper: "Generic warp drives violate the null energy condition"

 Hello all, I was pointed to a paper that appeared on the arXiv yesterday ( https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.03079v1 ). I am glad to see people taking a close look into my paper ( https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/abe692 , and the latest arXiv version https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.07125v2 ) and the other recent papers on the topic of warp drives ( https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/abdf6e ,  https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.06488 ). I have also been contacted in the last months by several other researchers working to reproduce and expand upon my results. I wanted to make a running post on this paper and a series of posts on other appraisals of my work in this field and the resulting discussions. After reading through their entire paper, I noticed that this new manuscript seems to have overlooked my complete discussion of the weak energy condition (WEC) contained in my published paper, instead referring to an early arXiv manuscript that tracked quantities of energy, momentum, etc. in only an E...
Read more