Saturday Feature: Article in The Academic Times

 Hello all,

An article about my warp drive paper came out recently, and I wanted to share it here. The article provides some further commentary made by other physicists about my paper, so it gives a better sense for where the topic stands among physicists. I was interviewed for this article and thought it was well done.

Here you go:

https://academictimes.com/this-design-for-a-faster-than-light-warp-drive-is-making-waves-but-physicists-disagree-on-whether-its-possible/

Happy Saturday,

Erik

Comments

  1. LorenzoApril 24, 2021 at 1:27 PM

    What do you think about this new paper

    ReplyDelete
  2. LorenzoApril 24, 2021 at 1:28 PM

    https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.06488

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ErikMay 1, 2021 at 9:10 AM

      I found this paper very interesting. I know the first author, Shaun Fell, and we have been in touch. I might write a post after a revised manuscript comes out.

      Delete
  3. SimKoningApril 26, 2021 at 8:09 AM

    Even if the bubble can't be accelerated to superluminal speeds, doesn't this hint at the possibility of other spacetime shortcuts that don't violate energy conditions? Something like the Krasnikov tube for example? A shortcut constructed at initially subluminal (though relativistic) speeds wouldn't necessarily violate causality or have problems with horizons while still allowing for short round trips. Van Den Broeck's version houses the bubble in what's essentially a wormhole, has there been other attempts to combine the two concepts (wormholes + warp drives) further?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Please note that comments undergo a moderation process and may not appear immediately. Thanks!

Popular posts from this blog

The Horizon Problem for Faster than Light Travel

Image
Hello all, As I have mentioned in previous posts, a major hurdle for autonomous FLT travel is the horizon problem. But what is a horizon? Is it some single well-defined concept or a catch-all term for many phenomena? In this post, I present some thoughts on horizons in general relativity theory and their implications for FTL travel using warp drives. A horizon is a limit to the region that can be observed or communicated with in a space. On Earth, horizons can be used to refer to edge of what can be seen when looking out over a vast body of water like an ocean. The limit to what can be seen in this case is caused by the curvature of the Earth's surface and is a cute problem to calculate how distant the horizon appears given the height of an observer above the surface of a spherical Earth (ignoring effects of the Earth's atmosphere) that is straightforward to solve as it is embedded in a Euclidean geometry.  An observer looking out to the Earth's horizon from a height h abov...
Read more

Warp Drive Soliton Inertia

Hello All, In this post I log some thoughts on another proposed challenge to superluminal warp drives: acceleration of the soliton past the speed of light. In their paper published earlier this year, Bobrick and Martire ( Introducing Physical Warp Drives ) state on page 17 of their pre-print that one cannot accelerate a subluminal warp drive to superluminal speeds for similar reasons as why one cannot accelerate masses moving through space-time to superluminal speeds: Warp drives can move superluminally only in the same sense as any ordinary inertial mass, test mass, or any other object. Namely, there is no known way of accelerating regular material beyond the speed of light. However, one may postulate a test particle which moves faster than light in relativity, in which case it may continue moving inertially. In the same way, a s warp drives are shells of material, there is no known way of accelerating a warp drive beyond the speed of light. However, one may also postulate the warp ...
Read more

Response to new paper: "Generic warp drives violate the null energy condition"

 Hello all, I was pointed to a paper that appeared on the arXiv yesterday ( https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.03079v1 ). I am glad to see people taking a close look into my paper ( https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/abe692 , and the latest arXiv version https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.07125v2 ) and the other recent papers on the topic of warp drives ( https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/abdf6e ,  https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.06488 ). I have also been contacted in the last months by several other researchers working to reproduce and expand upon my results. I wanted to make a running post on this paper and a series of posts on other appraisals of my work in this field and the resulting discussions. After reading through their entire paper, I noticed that this new manuscript seems to have overlooked my complete discussion of the weak energy condition (WEC) contained in my published paper, instead referring to an early arXiv manuscript that tracked quantities of energy, momentum, etc. in only an E...
Read more